RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Sign Our Petition
  • Take Action
  • Tools
  • What's New
  •  

    WV PSC Order & Documents Published

    June 22nd, 2007

    On June 10, the WV Public Service Commission issued an order relating to Allegheny Power’s plans to run a huge power line through West Virginia.

    The 29-page order is summarized below:

    Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company
    Commission Procedural Order directing Applicant to give notice of filing by publishing, Appendix A, of this Order in the Counties of Grant, Hardy, Hampshire, Marion, Mineral, Monongalia, Preston, Taylor, and Tucker; that Applicant submit affidavits of publication immediately after publication; that Applicant give notice of the rate impact, Appendix B, by publishing in the Counties of Berkeley, Cabell, Greenbrier, Hancock, Harrison, Kanawha, Logan, Marion, Marshall, Mason, McDowell, Mercer, Mineral , Mingo, Monongalia, Ohio, Raleigh, Randolph, and Wood; that Applicant submit its study of CAD’s proposed alternate route, and supplemental testimony regarding the alternative route, and a description of alternative route in the form of a supplemental Form No. 14; that statements of position regarding whether Applicant must submit Rule 42 information on or before 6/28/2007, and that responses be filed on or before 7/9/2007; that statements of position regarding TrAILCo Relief Items 3, 4, and 5 be filed on or before 8/1/2007, and replies be filed on or before 8/8/2007; that petitions to intervene filed by CAD, WVEUG, and LRCWA are granted; that Halleck/Triune Community’s petition to intervene is granted, conditioned upon the Community obtaining an attorney to represent it; that IBEW’s petition to intervene is granted, conditioned upon IBEW obtaining an attorney to represent it; etc.

    The order requires Allegheny to publish certain materials in a number of counties, including Hampshire and Hardy. The June 20 issue of The Hampshire Review contains two full pages (6D-7D). That issue will remain on sale through Tuesday, June 26, and is worth picking up.

    The entire PSC order can be found on the Commission’s Web site at http://www.psc.state.wv.us/imaged_files/Orders/2007_06/ord20070611115531.pdf

    If someone has figured out what all this means, please attach a comment or get in touch with the Capon Valley Coalition at CVC@caponvalleycoalition.com.


    Power Line Aimed At Md.: Interstate Proposal Called Threat to Treasured Sites (Washington Post)

    June 22nd, 2007

    Here is more about the NEW power line planned for West Virginia. You can view the original at WashingtonPost.com.

    A new high-voltage line that would deliver electricity to the growing mid-Atlantic region could stretch across parts of Western Maryland and end just shy of the Montgomery County line under a plan endorsed yesterday by the operator of the region’s electricity grid.

    The proposed $1.8 billion power line is being billed as an important part of an effort to improve the electric power grid serving the East Coast. It would carry enough electricity to power an estimated 2.5 million homes, making it the highest capacity transmission line in the nation, industry sources said, larger than the controversial Dominion Virginia Power line proposed in Northern Virginia.

    The approximately 300-mile transmission line would start at a coal plant in Winfield, W.Va., pass through Bedington, W.Va., and end at a substation to be built in Kemptown, Md.

    Its specific route has not been determined, but it would likely cut through environmentally sensitive and historically significant terrain, which includes the Potomac and Kanawha rivers, the scenic Allegheny Highlands and the Civil War battlefields at Antietam and South Mountain.

    That concerns local officials, residents and environmentalists who are already voicing opposition, arguing that the new line could threaten the rural character of Frederick and alter scenic areas that local and state governments have spent money protecting.

    “It could go through our rural legacy area, which we would oppose,” said Jan H. Gardner (D), president of the Frederick County Board of Commissioners. “The rural legacy area certainly protects the history of that area, the South Mountain battlefield in that area. . . . It could have impacts on the scenic view shed of Sugarloaf Mountain.”

    Pennsylvania-based PJM Interconnection, which controls the electricity transmission grid serving 13 mid-Atlantic states and the District, voted yesterday to authorize two power companies, American Electric Power and Allegheny Energy Inc., to build the line.

    By routing electricity from Appalachia and the Midwest to the more densely populated East Coast cities, the line will help relieve overloads that PJM anticipates will occur as early as 2012.

    “The Baltimore-Washington area is an area of growing demand and diminishing resources,” PJM spokesman Ray Dotter said. “It’s all about how to keep the lights on. If a power line will be overloaded, how do you avoid it being overloaded.”

    The $1.8 billion cost of the power line would be split between all the power companies operating in PJM’s network, Dotter said.

    In PJM’s network, which serves about 51 million people, electricity use is expected to increase by about 17 percent in the next decade, Dotter said. He likened the electricity grid to an interstate highway system and said the new line is akin to a major new interstate, which could help relieve bottlenecks throughout the network.

    PJM’s vote yesterday opened the process to build the line. The two power companies said they will begin mapping out a detailed route and studying any environmental or other impacts.

    Then the companies must present their plan to state regulators in Maryland and West Virginia for approval. But this power line, like the one proposed in Virginia, could test a new law that gives the power companies authority to bypass the states and secure land through the federal government if their services are deemed vital to national energy interests.

    American Electric Power spokeswoman Melissa McHenry said the company is “fully committed to work with the state process.”

    “It’s not our intention to circumvent the state,” McHenry said.

    The first 250 miles of the line between Winfield and Bedington are proposed to be 765,000 volts. For the remainder, between Bedington and Kemptown, it would change to twin 500,000-volt lines.

    Along the route would be hundreds of 125-foot towers with cables running in between on a corridor estimated at about 200 feet wide, said Allen Staggers, a spokesman for Allegheny Energy.

    Frederick County resident Rolan Clark said he wrote letters of objection to state and federal officials. “Frederick is going to be like a birdcage,” he said. “You’ll look up and all you’ll see is wires.”

    Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley (D) has not taken a position on the power line, aides said. Neither has Rep. Roscoe G. Bartlett (R-Md.), whose Western Maryland district includes the area where the line would end.

    Gardner said Frederick commissioners will not take a position on the power line until the route is set.

    To protest the Virginia and Maryland lines, environmentalists and residents formed the Mid-Atlantic Area Concerned Citizens Energy Coalition. The group believes that authorities should consider alternative energy options, organizer Barbara Kessinger said.

    Executives for the two companies responsible for the new power line issued statements yesterday saying the line is needed to relieve congestion on the existing power grid.

    PJM also authorized yesterday a second power line that would run about 130 miles from northeastern Pennsylvania to northern New Jersey. The 500,000-volt line would cost $930 million to construct and would address overloads projected to occur as soon as 2013 in those states.

    Both power lines are similar to the Dominion Virginia Power line proposed last year for Northern Virginia. The 500,000-volt Dominion line would wind through Loudoun, Prince William, Fauquier and Rappahannock counties.


    Here Comes Another Power Line

    June 22nd, 2007

    American Electric Power put out this press release today about a new power line coming through West Virginia.

    AEP and Allegheny 765-kV transmission project approved by PJM

    COLUMBUS, Ohio, June 22, 2007 – American Electric Power’s (NYSE: AEP) 765-kilovolt (kV) joint transmission line proposal with Allegheny Energy Inc. (NYSE: AYE) was approved today by PJM Interconnection (PJM).

    The PJM board included the Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) project in their five-year PJM Regional Transmission Expansion Plan (RTEP) designed to maintain the reliability of the transmission grid. The PJM plan approves the building of 250 miles of 765-kV extra-high voltage trans-mission from AEP’s Amos substation near St. Albans, W.Va., to Bedington substation, northeast of Martinsburg, W.Va. Another 40 miles of transmission, consisting of twin-circuit 500-kV transmission, will be constructed from Bedington to a new substation to be built at Kemptown, located southeast of Frederick, Md.

    AEP and Allegheny announced plans April 18 to form a joint venture to build PATH. The total project is estimated to cost approximately $1.8 billion. AEP’s estimated share of the costs will be approximately $600 million. The PJM RTEP calls for the PATH line to be put in service by June 2012 to meet the reliability needs of the region.

    “PJM approval allows us to move forward with construction of a significant portion of the I-765 TM transmission superhighway that is urgently needed to help relieve transmission congestion and enhance reliability in PJM. PJM’s analysis shows that the transmission system in this region will be overloaded as soon as 2012 unless upgrades are made. This project will expand the benefits of 765-kV extra-high voltage transmission in PJM to enhance reliability and address issues preventing efficient flow of electricity into this area,” said Michael G. Morris, AEP chairman, president and chief executive officer.

    AEP and Allegheny expect to formalize their joint venture agreement for PATH within the coming weeks and file for incentive rate recovery from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). AEP and Allegheny also will begin work on a routing study and environmental assessment for the project. The companies will seek regulatory approvals from the utility commissions in both West Virginia and Maryland for the project following the completion of the routing study.

    AEP will have lead responsibility for engineering, designing and managing the construction of the 765-kV elements of the project. Allegheny will have similar responsibilities for the twin-circuited 500-kV line. Each company will provide services to the joint venture for siting, acquiring rights-of-way, securing regulatory approvals from the states the line crosses and maintenance of the project.

    The PATH project encompasses the first half of the AEP I-765TM Interstate Project, a 550-mile, $3 billion 765-kV transmission line proposed by AEP in January 2006. The remaining portion of AEP’s proposed I-765 TM Interstate Project from Kemptown Station into New Jersey remains under study by PJM and is not part of the joint venture.

    American Electric Power is one of the largest electric utilities in the United States, delivering electricity to more than 5 million customers in 11 states. AEP ranks among the nation’s largest generators of electricity, owning more than 38,000 megawatts of generating capacity in the U.S. AEP also owns the nation’s largest electricity transmission system, a nearly 39,000-mile network that includes more 765 kilovolt extra-high voltage transmission lines than all other U.S. transmission systems combined. AEP’s transmission system directly or indirectly serves about 10 percent of the electricity demand in the Eastern Interconnection, the interconnected transmission system that covers 38 eastern and central U.S. states and eastern Canada, and approximately 11 percent of the electricity demand in ERCOT, the transmission system that covers much of Texas. AEP’s utility units operate as AEP Ohio, AEP Texas, Appalachian Power (in Virginia and West Virginia), AEP Appalachian Power (in Tennessee), Indiana Michigan Power, Kentucky Power, Public Service Company of Oklahoma, and Southwestern Electric Power Company (in Arkansas, Louisiana and east Texas). AEP’s headquarters are in Columbus, Ohio.