RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • News
  • Sign Our Petition
  • Take Action
  • Tools
  • What's New
  •  

    National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Call to Action

    February 3rd, 2008

    Bill Golemon, our CVC Chairman, passed on this urgent call to action from our allies across the state line in Virginia, the Piedmont Environmental Council:

    Please call Senator Rockefeller and Senator Byrd next week and ask them to sign onto a letter requesting oversight hearings on National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Designation (the letter is attached). The Department of Energy has designated 42 of 55 counties in West Virginia as part of the Mid-Atlantic NIETC.

    Within this area, an interstate transmission line applicant has access to federal eminent domain to site the line. NIETC could be used to site the TrAILCo/Dominion transmission line in West Virginia.

    Please ask your Senators to join Senators Casey, Whitehouse and Biden in asking the Energy & Natural Resources Committee to hold hearings on this flawed policy.

    Senator Rockefeller’s DC office: (202)224-6472

    Senator Byrd’s DC office: (202)224-3954

    For more information, please contact Liese Dart at (202)857-6982 or by email at ldart@pecva.org.

    What is NIETC Designation?

    Sec. 1221 of the 2005 Energy Policy Act provided the Department of Energy the discretion to designate National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETC) in areas of the United States that are found to be electrically congested. If a project lies within an NIETC, a utility may appeal an unfavorable state decision to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for use of federal eminent domain to site the project.

    Despite receiving over 2,000 comments against the designations, the Department of Energy designated two corridors on October 5, 2007. The first NIETC’s encompass portions of 10 states, 220 counties and impact more than 72 million people.

    The Department of Energy failed to conduct an alternatives analysis or to consult with the affected states prior to these designations, both requirements of Sec. 1221. Although this policy could be used to provide long distance transmission access to our nation’s developing wind and solar facilities, the Department of Energy has not designated areas of the country that are identified as having significant renewable resources.

    The Mid-Atlantic NIETC designation will increase transmission infrastructure to coal-fired generation built prior to the 1972 Clean Air Act, facilities that lie outside of the EPA’s non-attainment area for air quality. These investments in unnecessary interstate transmission will make cleaner alternatives such as efficiency and demand response technologies less economically viable.

    Eight of the ten states in the first NIETC designations have filed Petitions for Rehearing against the Department of Energy’s final decision.

    Map of Mid-Atlantic NIETC area


    Something to Watch: WV PSC Hearings on Allegheny Power’s TrAIL

    December 16th, 2007

    The West Virginia Public Service Commission has scheduled a series of “evidentiary” hearings on Allegheny Power’s TrAIL power line in Charleston next month.

    The hearings will take place in the Public Service Commission Building at 201 Brooks Street on Jan. 9-12 and Jan. 14-19. If more time is needed, they will continue Feb. 12-15.

    These hearings are open to the public, but are not for taking public comment.

    You can keep track of the Allegheny Power case (#07-0508-E-CN) via the PSC Web site, including this running log of all documents filed in the case. All documents must be made public.

    Among the documents available are complete transcripts of the public hearing held Oct. 30 in Moorefield:


    Manchin Misses the Point on Allegheny Power’s TrAIL … Again

    December 9th, 2007

    West Virginia Gov. Joe Manchin sent out the following article to constituents on Friday.

    It’s a reasonable piece with reasoned arguments: In a nutshell, he says we need more electricity and we need coal plants to provide it but we also need to clean them up. Reasonable people can agree with that.

    Where Manchin is totally off the map — and maybe that’s the problem, maybe he can’t read a map — is that he simply will not stand up and tell the East Coast states to build the coal-powered electric plants in their states, in their communities, in their neighborhoods. They need the electricity; they should put the plants right there!

    We will be happy to sell them all the West Virginia coal they need to produce the power that they use.

    We just don’t want our neighborhoods and mountains and valleys trashed up to provide profits for electric utilities headquartered in other states and selling coal — again — to other states.

    It’s not that hard a concept, Joe. We assume you would not like one of your neighbors running a bunch of those bright orange electric cords through your living room, dining room and kitchen and out the back door to provide power to a neighbor on the other side of your house. Right? It’s that simple.

    We don’t benefit. And right now, Allegheny Power wants us to pay higher electric rates to run the bright orange cable through our bedroom. Can you see why we are more than a little mad at your weasel words? Governors in other states get it. Why don’t you?

    Go sell all the West Virginia coal you can, Governor. But keep power lines that do not benefit West Virginians out of our West Virginia communities.

    Here’s the Manchin piece:

    Dec. 7, 2007

    Greening Coal for a Bright America
    An Opinion Article by Gov. Joe Manchin, Joined by Kentucky Gov.-elect Steve Beshear

    Contact: Lara Ramsburg, 304-558-2000

    As the governor of the second-largest coal producing state in our nation, and as chair of the regional interstate compact Southern States Energy Board (SSEB), I would like to offer some insight into the importance of greening of coal for a bright future in America.

    Today, we hear the terms energy security and climate change spoken almost in the same breath. Those two key issues are running up against a third, less-spoken concern that is surely as certain to require our attention in the near future. Simply put, we are faced with shortages of electrical generating capacity and we need to act to maintain economic prosperity and to grow the economy. One of the critical responses to this national situation is for those with a stake in the solutions — Congress, governors, legislators, regulators, the utility industry — to start a serious dialogue to develop solutions to ensure an ongoing, reasonably priced, green and reliable energy supply.

    The North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) projects electrical system reserve margins will continue to shrink, indicating projected increases in peak demands continue to exceed projected committed resources beyond the next few years. To meet these shortfalls, the country needs a portfolio of electrical generating options that include new, cleaner, green coal-fueled generators as well as gas-fired generation; renewable energy resources including wind, solar and biomass; and a strong emphasis on energy efficiency in buildings.

    As we plan for a bright future fueled by our own indigenous resources, the mission of the SSEB comes to mind: “Through innovations in energy and environmental policies, programs and technologies, the Board enhances economic development and the quality of life in the South.”

    As we consider how we provide an adequate energy supply that is environmentally acceptable, we must recognize the critical role of technology in this three-fold discussion. Because of its wide availability, versatility and reasonable cost, clean coal technologies will be of strategic importance in the future.

    How can we utilize these plentiful indigenous coal resources in a green way to meet the future needs of our citizens? Coal currently is the fuel source for almost half of the electricity generated in the United States. Carl Bauer, director of the Department of Energy’s National Energy Technology Laboratory, testified at a recent congressional hearing that the United States has some 250 years of coal available given current technology, prices, and coal consumption. What actions are necessary to lead us toward a sustainable future, environmentally and economically, using these coal resources?

    While coal is expected to remain a major fuel for electricity generation for the foreseeable future, recent decisions by state public service commissions and utilities show a clear movement away from the resource due, primarily, to CO2 emissions. Fifteen coal plants have been canceled in Florida and 10 in Texas the past two years.

    Regulators require some utilities planning to build a coal plant to have a carbon plan projecting the lifetime emissions of the plant. The most promising opportunity to reduce CO2 emissions is carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), which traps CO2 and stores it underground, uses it for enhanced oil and coal bed methane recovery, or feeds CO2 to algae for biofuels production.

    Potential storage solutions include depleted oil and gas reservoirs, saline-filled formations or unmineable coal seams. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has formed seven regional partnerships that are testing technologies for large scale CCS.

    There are signs that advanced, clean coal technologies are making an impact on the nation’s electrical capacity. Indiana utility regulators recently approved Duke Energy’s proposed 630-megawatt integrated gasification combined cycle coal-fired power plant, equipped with advanced pollution controls. Duke Energy Indiana President Jim Stanley suggested that finding ways to burn plentiful, low-cost Midwest coal cleanly is fundamental to meeting customers’ demand for power at “one of the cleanest, coal-fired power plants in the world when it’s completed.” Duke will complete an engineering and design study to potentially capture up to 18 percent of the plant’s CO2 emissions and will design the plant so that CCS equipment could be added in the future.

    The DOE has a major research and development project under way, called FutureGen, which uses technology developments from a number of core R&D programs in providing near-zero atmospheric emissions from the clean power plant. This plant will be the cleanest fossil-fuel-fired power plant in the world. The project will use coal gasification technology integrated with combined cycle electricity generation and capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide.

    DOE will announce its final site selection for the FutureGen project in December, following a November release of the final environmental impact statement for all four candidate sites (Mattoon and Tuscola, Illinois and Odessa and Jewett, Texas). A report by the Electric Power Research Institute earlier this year recognizes the potential for FutureGen to fundamentally change our nation’s electricity infrastructure. The report acknowledges the importance of testing and proving the concepts so the combined technology can be made commercially cost-effective. FutureGen has the potential to be a major solution in the quest for green coal technologies.

    The real key to a successful future in the energy sector is sustainability. We need to keep learning how to optimize the use of our resources, become more energy efficient, and minimize waste. Sustainability is achieved when we incorporate a balance of environmental, economic and energy security goals to maintain a reliable and efficient power sector in our economy. We can implement demand reduction programs such as switching to compact fluorescent bulbs, installing high-efficiency heating and cooling systems, set back thermostats, insulation and storm doors. We can also provide incentives and promote renewable energy and energy efficiency, especially in our building designs. But we simply must invest in improving thermal efficiency at existing coal plants, begin construction of a new generation of clean, supercritical coal and integrated gasification combined cycle plants, and implement other advanced designs.

    Not since the 1970s have we seen so much discussion about the role of energy and how it is produced and used. Concerns about global warming and greenhouse gases, rising fossil energy costs, nuclear waste, summer blackouts and instability in energy rich regions of the world have led to intense debate in the United States over our energy future.

    Leadership and dialogue throughout the industry and at the national and state level is needed now more than ever. DOE Undersecretary of Energy Bud Albright recently described the “energy chaos” currently plaguing our country relative to the future role of coal. He said, “On one hand, the coal industry hears congressional leaders say they must reduce carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants, without specific plans. On the other hand, state regulators are turning down proposals for more efficient coal plants that produce less CO2 emissions.”

    This is a conundrum that must change if electric utilities are to preserve their reserve margins and if we are to continue our economic prosperity. Technological solutions leading to the greening of the coal industry hold the key to that promise for a bright future for America.

    This opinion article was jointly signed by Kentucky Gov.-elect Steve Beshear.


    One More PSC Hearing on Allegheny Power Nov. 26

    November 8th, 2007

    The West Virginia Public Service Commission has ordered that another hearing on Allegheny Power’s plans to build the TrAIL power line be held in Preston County, to the northwest of us, on Monday, Nov. 26.

    The hearings are open to the public; anyone can speak. All you have to do is say you are opposed. You don’t need to be a lawyer to express your opinion.

    The hearings will be held at 1:30 p.m. and again at 6:30 p.m., at the Kingwood Volunteer Fire Department and Community Building, 2nd Floor, Buckwheat Room, 115 Brown Avenue,
    Kingwood, West Virginia.


    Can Allegheny Power Take Your Land? Yes … and No!

    October 31st, 2007

    We got an exchange from a CVC member about whether Allegheny Power can take private property for its TrAIL power line, even if people don’t want to sell an easement.

    Here is part one:

    Heard this from one of our neighbors in River Ridge. Sounds like the power companies are using extreme scare tactics on people to give easement rights on land or the land will be taken.

    Here is what the neighbor wrote:

    …Who knows when this thing will be all said and done with the power lines. All I know is I have been contacted by TrailCo and they are pursuing easement agreements with land owners and the land owners that can not agree on a easement agreement trailco will start looking at filing for eminent domain on the land as the last resort.

    Part two, from Bri West of the Piedmont Environmental Council:

    Allegheny (TrAILCo) has every intention of employing eminent domain if people will not sell them the easements. But the trick is, they can’t use eminent domain or even build a line on their existing rights-of-way if their application is denied by the WV PSC. The time to fight back is now.

    So if you don’t want this to happen, do something about it NOW!